And this is me swimming in the Sea---I LOVE the water
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Kairos Missions Course in Constanta, RO
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
The Romanian Revolution: Part II
The Revolution brought Romania vast attention from the outside world. Initially, much of the world's sympathy inevitably went to the National Salvation Front government under Ion Iliescu, a former member of the Communist Party leadership and a Ceauşescu ally prior to falling into the dictator's disgrace in the early 1980s. The National Salvation Front, composed mainly of former members of the second echelon of the Communist Party, immediately assumed control over the state institutions, including the main media outlets, such as the national radio and television networks. They used their control of the media in order to launch virulent propaganda-style attacks against their new political opponents, the traditional democratic parties, which re-emerged after more than 50 years of underground activity.The identity of the terrorists remains a mystery to this day. No person has ever been officially charged with committing acts of terrorism, and this fact has raised many suspicions concerning the relationship between the terrorists and the new government.
It is likely that there was an ongoing conspiracy by members of a second echelon of the Communist Party, supported by Moscow possibly since 1982. These conspirators took advantage of the events in Timisoara to begin their drive to power. The claimed "terrorist" activity of those days were likely diversions organised by the same communist party conspirators to scare the population into seeking a "savior" and therefore embrace the "Salvation Front" without looking for new, uncompromised leaders. The Front appeared very well organised and suddenly replaced most revolutionaries pushed forward by the people from the street. Another interesting coincidence is the fall of the communist regimes in all Eastern Europe at about the same time, even if most of the citizens of these countries were very isolated from one each other. The lack of drive for democratic change in 1989 Romania was and is poorly understood in the West. The large majority of the population only wanted a better life and not necessarily democracy or regime change. This explains why Iliescu, a member of the communist party since his youth and who always repeated his socialist ideals has been in power for almost all 1990s decade. The events in 1989 Romania were not a revolution, just a coup d'etat.
There are several conflicting views on the events in Bucharest that led to the fall of Ceauşescu in 1989. One view is that a portion of the Romanian Communist Party CPEx
(Political Executive Council) tried and failed to bring about a scenario similar to that in the rest of the Eastern bloc Communist countries, where the Communist leadership would resign en masse, allowing a new government to emerge peacefully. Another view is that a group of military officers successfully staged a conspiracy against Ceauşescu. Several officers have claimed that they had been part of a conspiracy directed against Ceauşescu, but evidence beyond their own claims is scant, at best. The latter view is buttressed by a series of interviews given 2003–04 by former Securitate Lieutenant Colonel Dumitru Burlan Ceauşescu’s long-time bodyguard. The two theories are not necessarily mutually exclusive. [Romanian Revolution memorial right]In November 1989, Ceauşescu had visited Mikhail Gorbachev who asked him to resign: Ceauşescu flatly refused. The question of a possible resignation arose again on December 17. 1989 when Ceauşescu assembled the CPEx (Political Executive Council) to decide upon the necessary measures to crush the Timişoara uprising. Although meeting minutes were taken, and were presented at the trial of several CPEx members, the surviving stenograma (minutes) at the time of the trial were frustratingly incomplete: pages were missing, including the discussion of a possible resignation.
According to the testimony of CPEx members Paul Niculescu-Mizil and Ion Dincă during their trial, at this meeting, just like in Bulgaria and East Germany, two of the members of CPEx disagreed with the use of force to suppress the uprising. In response, Ceauşescu offered his resignation and asked the members of CPEx to elect another leader. However, other members of CPEx, including Gheorghe Oprea and Constantin Dăscălescu asked Ceauşescu not to resign, but to sack those two who opposed his decisions instead. Later that day, Ceauşescu left Romania to visit Iran leaving the task of resolving the uprising in Timişoara to his wife and other acolytes. According to one of the recent insider memoirs, following the Timişoara uprising, a group of conspiring Securitate generals took advantage of this opportunity to launch a coup in Bucharest. The coup, allegedly in preparation since 1982, was originally planned for New Year’s Eve, but it had to be redesigned on-the-move, so as to take advantage of the favourable developments. The lead-conspirator, General Stănculescu, was part of Ceauşescu’s inner circle, and he is said to have convinced the dictator to hold the mass rally in front of the Central Committee building, in a plaza that had already been prepared with remote-controlled automatic guns. During Ceauşescu's address, the remote-controlled automatic guns were set to fire randomly over the crowd while agitators would use bullhorns to instigate the crowd with anti-Ceauşescu slogans.
At one point, there was a battle over Otopeni Airport near Bucharest where each side apparently thought the other was fighting on behalf of Ceauşescu. This led to the question of who was shooting at whom, and which side did they think they were serving?
For several months after the events of December 1989, it was widely argued that Iliescu and the FSN had merely taken advantage of the chaos to stage a coup. While, ultimately, a great deal did change in Romania, it is still very contentious among Romanians and other observers as to whether this was their intent from the outset, or merely pragmatic playing of the cards they were dealt. What is clear is that by December 1989 Ceauşescu's harsh and counterproductive economic and political policies had cost him the support of many government officials and even the most loyal Communist Party cadres, most of whom joined forces with the popular revolution or simply refused to support him. This loss of support from regime officials ultimately set the stage for Ceauşescu's demise.
There are also many conspiracy theories about the roles of organizations such as the CIA and the KGB and their alleged involvement in the revolution.
In May 1990, partly due to the National Salvation Front's use of the media and of the partly preserved Communist Party infrastructure to silence the democratic opposition, Iliescu became Romania's first elected president after the revolution, with a majority of 85%. These elections have been condemned as undemocratic by both Romanian traditional parties and by the Western media. Iliescu, himself a former communist opperative (head of propoganda for years), could hardly have been seen as someone from the "outside" bringing change.Iliescu did not renounce the communist ideology and the program he initially presented during the revolution included restructuring the agriculture and the reorganization of trade, but not a switch to capitalism. These views were held by other members of the FSN, such as Silviu Brucan, who claimed in early 1990 that the revolution was against Ceauşescu, not against communism. Iliescu later evoked the possibility of trying a "Swedish model" of socialism.
existent, or (according to case) black and white copiers, or compressed air rifles used for target practice. The miners' violence led to an official figure of at least 6 dead (some sources estimate figures between 200 and 300 dead), with at least 5,000 injured. Miners shouted slogans such as Moarte intelectualilor! ("Death to intellectuals") or Noi muncim, nu gândim ("We work, don't think!" - implying legitimacy).I thank you [miners] for all you've done these past few days, in general for your attitude of high civic conscience.
He expanded on this, declaring a right-wing liberal neo-fascist international conspiracy to have attempted the usurping of legitimate power and the destruction of the progressive left within Romania.
According to his lawyer and the military prosecutor Dan Voinea. Ion Iliescu has been recently placed under criminal law investigation (the official term for prosecution) with regard to the events that occurred in June 1990 in Bucharest. If convicted on all charges (that include crimes against humanity, accessory to murder and revolt, censorship), he faces life imprisonment.
the Ciorbea government initiated its "shock therapy" programme, however the reform proved difficult: given the slow pace of privatisation and the stagnation during the previous government, the government's attempt to restructure the state industries was fitful, and the pace of privatisation was slowed. Blaming the old bureaucratic structures, Ciorbea launched a drive to streamline the various departments from the top down. These changes were promptly attacked as "political purges" by the opposition parties.The reason for the delaying reforms can be explained by the lack of homogeneity and consensus of the coalition formed of three political alliances.Widespread disagreement and tension surfaced within each of the three groupings, as well as between them, and nearly every political formation was plagued by infighting and rifts.
This perpetual friction slowed down the lawmaking process, producing constant delays in adopting laws by Parliament, and forced the Cabinet to resort to "emergency ordinances" to speed it up. This made many Romanians feel that the normal democratic process was circumvented. Coalition solidarity manifested, however, when the government rejected the flurry of no-confidence and nonbinding motions initiated by the opposition, such as the one introduced in mid-December that would have held the government responsible for the plummeting living standards.
By August, the government had admitted that living standards were still falling, and announced the closing of 14 loss-making state enterprises. A government reshuffle was attempted, but was only completed on 2 December, and it succeeded in only plunging the coalition into a severe crisis once two key PD ministers resigned from the cabinet. One-third of the ministerial posts, including finance, reform, and industry and commerce, were affected. A privatization ministry was created to replace several institutions with overlapping responsibilities. Only days later, however, the Cabinet was again plunged into crisis when the two UDMR ministers boycotted meetings to protest the coalition's failure to permit education of the country's large Magyar minority in the Hungarian language in all subjects. Foreign Minister Adrian Severin of the Democratic Party (PD, the leading force in the USD) resigned on December 23 after he claimed that some party leaders and media directors were working for foreign secret services. The crisis ended only when Ciorbea resigned in 1998, both as Prime Minister of Romania and Mayor of Bucharest.
By this time, dissatisfaction with government policies was rising. This led to a wave of protests by workers, students, and others that peaked in October.
Eventually, Romania had only a few months to draw up an economic strategy for the period 2000–06 in order to prepare Romania for accession to the European Union (EU). Isarescu won praise for persuading the Social Democratic Party of Romania (PDSR), the main opposition party, to endorse a policy committing Romania to a steady shift toward a market economy. Enjoying a runaway lead in the opinion polls, the PDSR was committed to an economic strategy drawn up in conjunction with officials from the EU, World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
A modest recovery at the beginning of 2000 suffered a setback by a severe drought, and a subsequent bad harvest, requiring costly imports of grain and foodstuffs.
Joining NATO and the European Union were proclaimed Romania's top foreign policy priorities. With these objectives in mind, Romania sought to improve relations with its neighbours and signed a basic treaty with Ukraine in June. The country was nonetheless passed over in the first wave of expansion by both NATO and the EU.In March 1998 Constantinescu attended the London conference of European Union member states and candidates, and in July he took advantage of a nine-day visit in the U.S. to argue before a joint session of Congress that his country played a key role in Balkan stability and should therefore be admitted to NATO. In October Romania agreed to allow limited access to its air space in the event of NATO military intervention in the Serbian province of Kosovo.
However, the former President returned to the political scene in 2002 as head of the Acţiunea populară (People's Action) party. On the international level, he committed himself to the eventual integration of Romania into the European Union (2007) and NATO (2004) structures; to the strengthening of bilateral links with other countries as well as to the implementation of trilateral political and economic agreements among states.
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Global Day of Prayer
Thursday, May 08, 2008
The Romanian Revolution: Part I
The Romanian Revolution of 1989 was a week-long series of increasingly violent riots and fighting in late December 1989 that overthrew the Communist regime of Nicolae Ceauşescu, and after a summary trial, the execution of Ceauşescu and his wife Elena by firing squad. Romania was the only Eastern Bloc country to overthrow its Communist regime violently or to execute its leaders.By 1989, Ceauşescu was showing signs of a complete denial of reality. While Romania had the lowest living standards in any of the Eastern Bloc nations, Ceauşescu seemed to have no awareness of this, believing that he had brought Romania to one of the highest standards of living ever known to mankind, actually believing that he turned Romania into a Utopia. Ceauşescu claimed that under his regime the arts were flourishing, healthcare was at an all-time high, the sciences were making breakthrough discoveries, and Romania was making record harvests, enough to serve the country for years to come. All the people really got was a lifetime of propaganda, barrack-like apartments, physically insolvent healthcare services (resulting in a huge HIV epidemic), crippling energy shortages, and hours of waiting outside empty bread ration stores. Not to mention that all sc
ientific discoveries were to be credited to Ceauşescu's hated wife Elena. Also, while people were suffering under his disastrous policies, Ceauşescu and his family were living the high life, with large palaces boasting luxuries outseating even today's standards.
police beat up rioters and arrested many of them. Around 9:00 p.m., the rioters withdrew. They regrouped eventually around the Romanian Orthodox Cathedral and started a protest march around the city, but again they were confronted by the security forces.Riots and protests resumed the following day, December 17. The rioters broke into the District Committee building and threw Party documents, propaganda brochures, Ceauşescu's writings, and other symbols of communist power out the windows. Since Romania did not have a riot police (Ceauşescu, who belived the Romanian people loved him, never saw the need for the formation of one), the military were sent in to control the riots, since the situtation was too large for the Securitate and police to handle. The significance of the army presence in the streets was an ominous one: it meant that they had received their orders from the highest level of the command chain, presumably from Ceauşescu himself. Although the army failed to establish order, it succeeded in turning Timişoara into a living hell: gunfire, casualties, fights and burning cars.
As he was addressing the crowd from the balcony of the Central Committee building, sudden movement came from the outskirts of the massed assembly, as did the sound of (what various sources have reported as) fireworks, bombs, or guns, which together caused the assembly to break into chaos. Initially frightened, the crowds tried to disperse. Bullhorns then began to spread the news that the Securitate was firing on the crowd and that a "revolution" was unfolding. This persuaded people in the assembly to join in. The rally turned into a protest
demonstration.The entire speech was being broadcast live around Romania, and it is estimated that perhaps 76% of the nation was watching. Censors attempted to cut the live video feed, and replace it with communist propaganda songs and video praising the Ceauşescu regime, but parts of the riots had already been broadcast and most of the Romanian people realized that something unusual was in progress.
Ceauşescu and his wife, as well as other officials and CPEx members, panicked, and Ceauşescu went into hiding inside the building.
The reaction of the Ceauşescu couple on the balcony is memorable: They staged futile attempts to regain control over the uprising crowd using phone conversation formulas such as "Alo, Alo" ("Hello, Hello"), Ceauşescu's wife "advised" him how to contain the situation "Vorbeşte-le, vorbeşte-le" ("Talk to them, talk to them"), and they urged the crowd "Staţi liniştiţi la locurile voastre" ("Sit quiet in your places"). In the end Ceauşescu allowed himself to be directed into the Central Committee building by his underlings.
The jeers and whistles soon erupted into riot; the crowd took to the streets, placing the capital, like Timişoara, in turmoil. Members of the crowd spontaneously began shouting anti-communist and anti-Ceauşescu slogans, which spread and became chants: "Jos dictatorul!" ("Down with the dictator"), "Moarte criminalului!" ("Death to the murderer"), "Noi suntem poporul, jos cu dictatorul!" ("We are the People, down with the dictator"), "Ceauşescu cine eşti?/Criminal din Scorniceşti" ("Ceauşescu, who are you? A murderer from Scorniceşti").
crowd around the Intercontinental Hotel, crushing people — a French journalist, Jean Louis Calderon, was killed; a street near University Square was later named after him). Firefighters hit the demonstrators with powerful water jets and the police continued to beat and arrest people. Protesters managed to build a defensible barricade in front of Dunărea ("Danube") restaurant, which stood until after midnight, but was finally torn apart by government forces.By 10 A.M., as the radio broadcast was announcing the introduction of martial law and of a ban on groups larger than five persons, yet hundreds of thousands of people were gathering for the first time, spontaneously, in central Bucharest (the previous day's crowd had come together at Ceauşescu's orders). Ceauşescu attempted to address the crowd from the balcony of the Central Committee of the Communist Party building, but his attempt was met with a wave of disapproval and anger. Helicopters spread manifestos (which did not reach the crowd, due to unfavourable winds) instructing people not to fall victim to the latest "diversion attempts," but to go home instead and enjoy the Christmas feast (which infuriated the people more since it was compared to Marie Anntonetes "Let them Eat the Cake!" quote since the Romanian people even had trouble receiving cooking oil).
concluded that the minister killed himself. It seems, though, that his intention was only to incapacitate himself in order to be relieved from office, but the bullet accidentally hit an artery and he died soon afterwards.Ceauşescu and his wife Elena then fled the capital city by helicopter, accompanied by two loyal aides, Emil Bobu and Tudor Postelnicu. They headed for Ceauşescu's Snagov residence, and from there to Târgovişte. Near Târgovişte, at Boteni, they abandoned the
helicopter, whose pilot claimed that he was ordered to land by the army. By that time the army had closed all Romanian airspace. The Ceauşescus hitchhiked into Târgovişte. After some wandering through the industrial outskirts of the town, the couple decided to enter a building near a local steel plant. An engineer there recognized them and called the police. A nearby traffic police unit arrived and took the Ceauşescus to the local police headquarters, and afterwards to the army barracks across the street. There the Ceauşescus were informed that they had been arrested. On December 25, Christmas Day, the former dictator of Romania and his wife were sentenced to death by an ad hoc military court on a range of charges including genocide, and were executed by firing squad in Târgovişte.Footage of the trial and execution was promptly released in France and other western countries; an edited version (lacking footage of the actual execution) was released on television the same day for the Romanian public. Thus to Romanians, Christmas Day is known as the day the dictator fell.
Thursday, May 01, 2008
Peniel: National Youth Conference
- Life lived to the full does not mean fame and riches, success, etc., but rather, life lived with Christ in the fellowship of the Father.
- His grace is greater than our sin
- Neither the extreme of legalism or complete freedom in the Church is ideal: balance is needed
- We always need to be attentive to those around us and our spheres of influence--you never know when God will open a door for you to share Christ with someone or to speak truth into someone's life
It was a good conference with thousands in attendance. The greatest part of the conference was watching the hundreds of Romanian youth who made decisions for Christ or who came forward to confess, repent, or transform. Please pray that these youth will continue to grow in faith and knowledge and that the Christians around them would befriend them, encourage them, and pray with/for them.
Monday, April 28, 2008
Romanian Easter

The Eastern Orthodox tradition on the night before Easter is to light candles and go marching through the city. This is to represent that Jesus is the light of the world...the candles represent the light going out into the world. It's one of the traditions that I really love.
Another tradition in Romania is decorating eggs--which can be quite intricate. Families often dye eggs and try to crack one another's eggs saying "Hristos a inviat" (Christ is Risen), while the other person holding his/her egg replies "Adevarat a inviat" (He is risen indeed). Whoever's egg doesn't crack is the winner.Thursday, April 24, 2008
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Taste of Bucharest: Ateneul Român
The Romanian Athenaeum is a concert hall in the center of Bucureşti and a landmark of the Romanian capital city. Opened in 1888, the ornate, domed, circular building is the city's main concert hall and home of the George Enescu Philharmonic Orchestra and of the George Enescu annual international music festival held each September that brings in the world's best classical musicians each year. The concert hall is cited in many books as having the best acoustics of any concert hall in Europe, and perhaps the world. I was in western Europe on a tour of another opera house once when they said that the Bucharest Ateneul has the best acoustics. I, of course, was quite proud! The building itself is stunning, especially the history of Romania, which is painted on the wall of the semi-rotunda in the main hall. By design, the concert hall does not seat that many people. The intention was to create a more intimate feeling where the sound would just vibrate. Tickets to see a performance are still pretty reasonable for the average Romanian ($5-$15) and music students get in free to all performances (if seats are available). It truly is a special place to see a performance.Friday, April 18, 2008
Flowers in Bucharest
Sunday, April 13, 2008
Josh McDowell Conference
World-renowned Christian speaker/writer/evangelist Josh McDowell held a conference in Bucharest this weekend. He is known for writing such books as the national best-seller Why You Should Wait. On Saturday, we took our youth group to hear Josh McDowell speak at Sala Palatului (the very hall where the communists in Romania used to denounce the name of the Lord...what a blessing that now Christians hold conferences there) about "Sex: Myths and the Truth." It was very interesting. Josh McDowell is an engaging speaker with a somewhat "in-your-face" presentation (but effective). He has quite the testimony. He actually was writing a book to refute the claims of the Bible, and realized he couldn't. In the process, he ended up becoming a Christian. Here are some of the highlights of his speech:
- There are currently 39 STD's known in the world
- The newest discovered STD is called HPV (google it) and kills more people annually than HIV or AIDS. The virus HPV has been found in many cancer patients and is known to not show any symptoms for up to 8 years. Lots more I could say about this...but wow!
- When the U.S. government was reporting on the number of pregnancies women had, despite using a condom, they did NOT factor in the millions of abortions occurring in the U.S. annually. Why? The abortions were calculated as "success" stories for the effectiveness of condoms--since no baby was born (having been aborted), the abortions did not count as a condom deficiency. This has since been reversed, and the U.S. government has now required the condom companies to go back and recalculate, factoring in all of the abortions as far back as 1988.
- Josh McDowell reminded us how VERY few people realized when the condom companies switched their slogan from Safe Sex: Use a condom to SafER Sex: use a condom. Interesting isn't it? He said the companies were trying to save themselves from a lawsuit.
- Josh said the Center for Disease Control has confirmed that the reported 4-6 percent failure rate of condom use is a complete and utter fallacy---it is WAY higher (see above) ---especially in light of the new virus HPV that has been discovered---it is deadly and has no cure.
- The current Surgeon General of the United States has routinely called Josh McDowell and thanked him for preaching abstinence and has asked him to be even MORE direct
Anyway, it made for an interesting evening. Many, many non-Christians were in attendance--which was great! It is very rare for someone to talk about sex to Romanian youth, especially the Christian perspective. McDowell also engaged us in a dialogue about the definition of "love", saying that it is extremely rare for someone to be able to define it. He said 1 Corinthians 13 is not the definition of love, but the function of love, or rather, what love does (not what it is). According to McDowell, the clearest definition of love found in the Bible is Ephesians 5:29 for no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ also does the Church. McDowell states that in this verse we have hate and love juxtaposed, and that after the word "but", love is clearly defined. Love is nourishing and cherishing. McDowell would say that all of the Lord's commands center on these two principles. Because God is love, He protects and nourishes. Again, lots more I could say about this. Something to think about I guess. It was refreshing to hear a Biblical perspective and even better that many non-Christians were in attendance. Afterwards, a local music group "Proconsul" held a concert---many of their members are Christian.
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Mentoring Future Romanian Missionaries
Sunday, April 06, 2008
Volleyball in the Park
Thursday, April 03, 2008
Romanian TV coverage of Bush's arrival in Bucuresti
For those of you who like an international flavor...Romanian news coverage of President Bush's initial arrival. Later he went to the Black Sea to meet with Romanian President Traian Basescu and on their return, the more formal reception with soldiers was held.













